One of the questions I am asked by clients is how to achieve more with Twitter with the same resources that they already have. Quite often this is one person, who also has a bunch of other tasks they are doing so trying to manage multiple Twitter accounts becomes an increasingly difficult challenge. In these cases you can forget the standard web-interface, that is definitely not going to help you. There are downloadable tools to make managing Twitter easier, such as Tweetdeck & Twhirl. Of these only Thwirl has multi-account capablity but even that doesn’t really meet all the needs of a business user. I recently encountered two tools that have positioned themselves as business user Twitter tools – BrightKit & Spiltweet (thanks to @julialilly for the tip on this one). I took them both for a test drive and this is what I found.
| BrightKit | Splitweet | |
| Statistics | Yes | No |
| “Brand Tracking” | No | Yes |
| Ease of Setup | Yes | Yes |
| Scheduled Tweets | Yes | No |
| Follow from Tool | Yes | No |
| Multi-Account Support | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-User Support | Yes | No |
| Search | Yes | No |
Statistics
Any tool that is going to position itself for a business user needs to be able to provide some form of stats. There are external tools available that can help measure Twitter activity but it is nice to have the capability built into the tool that you are using to message from. Admittedly BrightKit’s statistics only apply to URL’s shortened with their proprietary URL shortener ow.ly but nonetheless the stats it gives you are excellent. Showing geographic data, and referrer link – e.g. whether the link was clicked in Twitter or someone else – this is a great way of seeing when your message is being seen outside of Twitter, e.g. through Friendfeed, on Facebook etc. Splitweet lacks this functionality or anything similar so definitely loses points for that. I would like to see BrightKit take their stats further but for now this is a great start.
Brand Tracking
This is a feature specific to Splitweet. Whilst I understand what the intent was of this functionality, to return results on a predetermined search string, I don’t think it is sophisticated enough to be of much use. It is a pretty blunt, fixed phrase search for the most part. I do like the way the results are shown in a sidebar on the mainscreen but I would like to see a much more sophisticated search setup for this. Twitter allows for geographic, user & even attitude elements to be searched. Its one thing to return the fact that a group of users have mentioned your brand name, but if you can’t immediately see if those messages were positive or negative you still have your work cut out for you.
Ease of Setup
Both tools were very straightforward to setup, and both allowed the addition of multiple accounts easily. Included in this is the UI. They have different ways of dealing with the same issues but overall it would come down to personal preference in terms of the UI’s they are both very clean and uncluttered.
Scheduled Tweets
Of the two only BrightKit has this feature. There is a lot of discussion about automated tweeting. I am not going to get into that discussion in this post. If you want a tool that will put out a tweet at a set time, then this is a great way to do it. Not least of which because unlike some of the other tools that do this, it allows you to include a link that is pre-shortened (and therefore trackable) along with the scheduling. You can also opt to have a confirmation email sent to you when the tweet goes out (I did have to retrieve mine from the spam folder, but that was the only issue).
Follow from the Tool
This feature I loved. Especially when used with the search functionality. Unfortunately again only BrightKit has either of these features. Perform a search for a particular phrase, brand name, anything and then simply click the follow button on a particular user – done. Unlike other tools it doesn’t bump you out to the Twitter home page.
Multi-Account Support
Both tools provide this support. Both make it very easy to set them up and to switch between accounts. In Splitweet it is simply a tick box, in BrightKit it is a dropdown. Again this comes down to personal preference in terms of the UI as the functionality is pretty much the same.
Multi-User Support
This feature is only available in BrightKit, and its great. You can setup a Twitter administrator and then appoint Editors to individual accounts. This is particularly useful for companies managing brand based accounts or for agencies setting up proxy users for clients. This means that you can use more resources from within the same tool but at the same time retain better control.
Search
Again only BrightKit has a search function, and again its possible to do this outside of any tool that you are using, but the question is why would you want to? I like the fact that this functionality is included in the tool.
Overall
In conclusion, I think both tools are a good attempt at providing business users with a better Twitter experience. I like the fact that they are both web-based meaning they can be accessed from anywhere. The fact that Splitweet actually refers to itself as “Multi-Account Twitter Management for Corporate Users” leaves it open to a lot of criticism given the paucity of features, especially when compared to BrightKit. My recommendation – BrightKit is the clear winner, at least for now.
If you enjoyed this post be sure to subscribe to the feed and have future posts delivered by RSS or email.
| I'm glad you took the time to read this post. |
| If you enjoyed it I'm sure you'll enjoy my once a week newsletter - Did You See..? - I'll send you a few stories from around the web that cover Social, Digital and Mobile Marketing that I found useful. It's a quick but informative read |





LinkedIn
Facebook
Twitter
Pingback: MarshalSandler.com » You are a brand on Twitter. Get on the list