<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Making Friends Social Engineering?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theincslingers.com/2009/03/is-making-friends-social-engineering/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theincslingers.com/2009/03/is-making-friends-social-engineering/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:05:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Never underestimate the importance of politics in social networking &#171; TechWag</title>
		<link>http://www.theincslingers.com/2009/03/is-making-friends-social-engineering/comment-page-1/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>Never underestimate the importance of politics in social networking &#171; TechWag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 18:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simonsalt.wordpress.com/?p=384#comment-173</guid>
		<description>[...] Is Making Friends Social Engineering? (simonsalt.wordpress.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is Making Friends Social Engineering? (simonsalt.wordpress.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ</title>
		<link>http://www.theincslingers.com/2009/03/is-making-friends-social-engineering/comment-page-1/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 00:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simonsalt.wordpress.com/?p=384#comment-172</guid>
		<description>The only reason Social Engineering doesn&#039;t work for me is because of how &quot;we&quot; used it back in the 80s and 90s during a lot of the hack/phrack/2600-ish times.  It meant something a lot different then, but I see where you&#039;re coming from.

It was great to have you in our Salon, you were a great participant and a great sport!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only reason Social Engineering doesn&#8217;t work for me is because of how &#8220;we&#8221; used it back in the 80s and 90s during a lot of the hack/phrack/2600-ish times.  It meant something a lot different then, but I see where you&#8217;re coming from.</p>
<p>It was great to have you in our Salon, you were a great participant and a great sport!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Verhoeven</title>
		<link>http://www.theincslingers.com/2009/03/is-making-friends-social-engineering/comment-page-1/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Verhoeven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simonsalt.wordpress.com/?p=384#comment-174</guid>
		<description>This is a interesting question you raise. I will try to answer it from 2 different angles that both add to your view. One there is an empirical social network analysis that shows that &lt;a href=&quot;http://2bloggen.org/2009/02/19/empirical-study-twitter-is-not-a-social-network-by-patrick-philippe-meyer/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Twitter is not a social network at all&lt;/a&gt;. Two our ability to make friends is not learned behaviour by excellence. In the nurture/nature debate, at least 50% should  be attributed to nature. Recent (last 10 years) neurological research points to &#039;mirror neurons&#039; being essential in creating empathy for others. You can read e.g. the article about it in the scholarpedia. A fiew years ago I have reviewed the opposite phenomenon of friendship: rejection. Also rejection is a process whose mechanisms are printed in our neurological circuits. See my paper &lt;a href=&quot;http://home.deds.nl/~danielverhoeven/PDF/Doesrejectionhurt.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Does rejection hurt?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a interesting question you raise. I will try to answer it from 2 different angles that both add to your view. One there is an empirical social network analysis that shows that <a href="http://2bloggen.org/2009/02/19/empirical-study-twitter-is-not-a-social-network-by-patrick-philippe-meyer/" rel="nofollow">Twitter is not a social network at all</a>. Two our ability to make friends is not learned behaviour by excellence. In the nurture/nature debate, at least 50% should  be attributed to nature. Recent (last 10 years) neurological research points to &#8216;mirror neurons&#8217; being essential in creating empathy for others. You can read e.g. the article about it in the scholarpedia. A fiew years ago I have reviewed the opposite phenomenon of friendship: rejection. Also rejection is a process whose mechanisms are printed in our neurological circuits. See my paper <a href="http://home.deds.nl/~danielverhoeven/PDF/Doesrejectionhurt.pdf" rel="nofollow">Does rejection hurt?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Myer</title>
		<link>http://www.theincslingers.com/2009/03/is-making-friends-social-engineering/comment-page-1/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Myer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simonsalt.wordpress.com/?p=384#comment-171</guid>
		<description>I think that at the end of the day, all human &quot;friending&quot; activity is based on things like affinity (this person shares my values, or is from my home country, or likes what I like), attraction (whether physical, emotional, etc), and some other  mix of risk/reward/gain.

In high school, some made friends with the outcasts because that was a way to cope with being an outcast. Others made friends with the popular and cool kids in order to be seen as cool -- tragically, a lot of those people just came off as posers.

I like your use of &quot;social engineering&quot; BTW, as it relates to using non-technical means to exploit (or gain access to) an information system. In some cases, that&#039;s what is going on, and in others, there are genuine connections.

I have a feeling that the next generation of tools like Twitter and Facebook will allow us to create groups/circles of trust--family and close friends in one, colleagues in another, old friends from high school we haven&#039;t seen in 15 years in another. TweetDeck already gives us some of this, but it&#039;s crucial in our attempts to maintain all these connections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that at the end of the day, all human &#8220;friending&#8221; activity is based on things like affinity (this person shares my values, or is from my home country, or likes what I like), attraction (whether physical, emotional, etc), and some other  mix of risk/reward/gain.</p>
<p>In high school, some made friends with the outcasts because that was a way to cope with being an outcast. Others made friends with the popular and cool kids in order to be seen as cool &#8212; tragically, a lot of those people just came off as posers.</p>
<p>I like your use of &#8220;social engineering&#8221; BTW, as it relates to using non-technical means to exploit (or gain access to) an information system. In some cases, that&#8217;s what is going on, and in others, there are genuine connections.</p>
<p>I have a feeling that the next generation of tools like Twitter and Facebook will allow us to create groups/circles of trust&#8211;family and close friends in one, colleagues in another, old friends from high school we haven&#8217;t seen in 15 years in another. TweetDeck already gives us some of this, but it&#8217;s crucial in our attempts to maintain all these connections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

